<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sid J.A. Hubbard Editorial Column</title>
    <link>https://sidhubbard.com/works.html</link>
    <atom:link href="https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Editorials and field notes by Sid J.A. Hubbard on intervention, nested causality, institutions, technology, and structural lift.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Rather Than Looking for Work</title>
      <link>https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/rather-than-looking-for-work.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/rather-than-looking-for-work.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>sid@sidhubbard.com (Sid J.A. Hubbard)</author>
      <description>Two papers, one missing boundary, and an attempt to find out whether an explanation could survive contact with a live problem.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        <p>I wrote <em>The Answers Were There All Along</em> because one of the most famous tensions in physics has become both widely known and poorly understood. I wanted a more narrative route into the possibility that General Relativity and quantum evolution do not need to consume one another; they may need explicit addresses for the scales in which their descriptions are lawful.</p>
        <p>A satisfying explanation can still be wrong. To find out whether I was merely enjoying my own machinery, I applied the missing-boundary idea to an existing apparatus-recoil problem. <em>The Return of Scale</em> preserves the published recoil baseline, defines an experimentally variable apparatus boundary, and accepts a null result.</p>
        <p>Read <a href="https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/rather-than-looking-for-work.html">Rather Than Looking for Work</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21380472">The Answers Were There All Along</a>, and <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21381025">The Return of Scale</a>.</p>
      ]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Game Theory Inside the Enclosure</title>
      <link>https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/ncm-game-theory.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/ncm-game-theory.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>sid@sidhubbard.com (Sid J.A. Hubbard)</author>
      <description>A new paper tests game theory and Nested Causal Modelling as adjacent analytical systems, arguing for enclosure-aware game theory: strategic prediction with explicit boundary audits.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        <p>The paper asks what happens when the relationship between game theory and Nested Causal Modelling is itself modeled as a nested causal structure.</p>
        <p>The finding is not that NCM replaces game theory. Game theory explains strategic action once a game has been formed. NCM asks what enclosure made that game appear, what boundary makes it valid, what lower system carries excluded costs, and what larger enclosure could transform the payoff structure.</p>
        <p>Read the full post at <a href="https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/ncm-game-theory.html">Game Theory Inside the Enclosure</a>. The paper is archived on Zenodo at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21306704">10.5281/zenodo.21306704</a>.</p>
      ]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sustained Departures From "The Idiot"</title>
      <link>https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/am-i-the-idiot.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/am-i-the-idiot.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 22:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>sid@sidhubbard.com (Sid J.A. Hubbard)</author>
      <description>Sid J.A. Hubbard intentionally placed Dostoevsky's The Idiot beside Causality &amp; Attraction Volumes 1-5, Nothing Is All You Need, Nested Causal Modelling 1.0, and the RTLDI Atlas. NotebookLM did not ignore it, which became an unscientific but funny meditation on 0-infinity, Myshkin, and relevance.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        <p>This is not a scientific post. It is a relaxed report from an intentional NotebookLM experiment: <em>Causality &amp; Attraction</em> Volumes 1-5, <em>Nothing Is All You Need</em>, <em>Nested Causal Modelling 1.0</em>, the RTLDI Atlas, and Dostoevsky's <em>The Idiot</em>.</p>
        <p>The NotebookLM systems did not ignore the novel. That does not make the output scientific, but it does mean the model found relevance in the source set.</p>
        <p>Read the full post at <a href="https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/am-i-the-idiot.html">Sustained Departures From "The Idiot"</a>.</p>
      ]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://sidhubbard.com/media/notebooklm-idiot/short-quantum-calculus.m4a" length="12353842" type="audio/mp4"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Systems Interventionist</title>
      <link>https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/the-systems-interventionist.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/the-systems-interventionist.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 12:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <author>sid@sidhubbard.com (Sid J.A. Hubbard)</author>
      <description>Silicon Valley has treated disruption as prestige. This first column reframes that zero-sum ethic as a weaker mode than structural intervention: designing the change that lifts the greatest number of people into the greatest profitability without requiring existing systems to be destroyed.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        <p>Silicon Valley, and especially the South of Market district in San Francisco, has long operated under a particular ethic: disruption. The word itself carries a strange prestige. To disrupt is to be bold, visionary, and unafraid. In practice, however, disruption has become a socially acceptable form of aggression.</p>
        <p>This is not disruption. This is intervention.</p>
        <p>An intervention starts with modeling the actual enclosures so you can see exactly what changes are necessary to make the lift as efficient and easy as possible. The best intervention is the one that raises profitability across every layer at once.</p>
        <p>Read the full post at <a href="https://sidhubbard.com/editorial/the-systems-interventionist.html">The Systems Interventionist</a>.</p>
      ]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
