Volume VI: Nested Causal Models, Maps, and Interventions
Establishes Nested Causal Modelling, ternary enclosure addresses, the Final Frontier, and the intervention discipline used in the forensic method.
Media / Strategic systems
Forensic NCM and 9/11
How Forensic Nested Causal Modelling separates the established attack, the later custody game, and the boundary of what the public evidence can support.
The program maps September 11 as more than one strategic enclosure: al-Qaeda’s established operational game; the distinct post-event game over records, classification, litigation, institutional defense, and public knowledge; and the long-lived legal, military, surveillance, and bodily structures produced afterward. It demonstrates how Forensic NCM can identify strategic structure without confusing downstream benefit with upstream authorship, then stops at the Final Frontier where physical, diplomatic, and archival evidence remains incomplete.
Terms in this film
Explore the same term in other films through the transcript glossary.
authorizationauthorshipboundariescustodyemergencyenclosureequilibriumevidenceexposurefinal frontierforensicforensic NCMgame theorygovernancehealthhistoryinformationintelligenceknowledgelegallifemattermilitarymoneynational securityNCMnested causal modellingpoliticalprotectionrealitysecurityseparationSeptember 11strategysurveillancesystemstimewarwork
Continue into the research
Related work
Forensic Nested Causal Modelling
The source work formalizing how to locate a suspected real-world game, derive its traces, follow custody, and preserve the unknown.
The Investigation Enters its 26th Year
Applies the same evidentiary boundary to the September 11 record and the structures that continued after the attacks.
Read the video transcript
Published captions, with their original wording.
We're about to look at one of the most defining moments in modern history, but we're going to do
it completely differently. We're stepping away from the politics and the emotion, and instead,
we're going to use a fiercely objective, groundbreaking analytical framework called
Forensic NCM to literally map out the architecture of September 11.
It all starts with a really profound question. How does a single date become a quarter-century
long institution? I mean, the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001 ended on that very day,
right? But the systems, the structures, and the rules they created, those definitely did not.
It's kind of fascinating when you think about it, how a finite event just morphs into this
permanent fixture that impacts almost every part of our modern lives. Here's our roadmap for this
explainer. One, the event that never ended. Two, enter Forensic NCM. Three, the operational game.
Four, the post-event custody game. Five, a new outer enclosure. And six, the Final Frontier.
Section one, the event that never ended. A date becomes an institution.
So September 11 started as this horrific morning. Four hijacked aircraft, the tragic loss of 2,977
victims. But almost immediately, the very name 9/11 expanded exponentially. It became this massive
blank check for war. It became a justification for sweeping secrecy, and it literally birthed
an entire federal department, the DHS. What started as an event transformed into a permanent
political tent that's now spanned a quarter of a century. Section two, enter Forensic NCM,
mapping suspected games in real life. Now, to analyze a historical expansion this massive,
without falling into, you know, a blind cheerleading or just baseless conspiracy theories,
we need a fiercely neutral tool. That brings us to the work of Sid J.A. Hubbard. Volume six of his
text formally establishes a discipline called Nested Causal Modelling, or NCM. Basically,
it's a way to understand how systems and actions are literally nested inside of one another.
Here's the core of it. Forensic NCM is the practice of locating a suspected game theory game
inside real enclosures, following its projections, and stopping exactly where the evidence stops.
The really crucial point here is that this allows us to map strategic behavior and
institutional responses without needing to know every single actor's identity up front.
We can just look at a pattern in reality, recognize that a game is being played,
complete with strategies, information gaps, and payoffs, and map its boundaries based purely on
the evidence left behind. Forensic NCM uses a three-part address system to map reality. Think
of it like nested boxes. It always follows this structure. First, you have the outer conditions
that enclose the event, then the actual event itself right in the middle, and finally,
the physical or informational products that the event encloses downstream.
Section three, the operational game, enclosing the attack. Let's take that exact analytical lens and
point it directly at 9/11. When we set up the NCM address for that day, it goes like this.
The attacks are enclosed by prior conditions, specifically U.S.-Saudi intelligence relations
and existing aviation protocols. In the center is the event itself, and downstream, that event
encloses its direct products, the physical destruction, the victims, the dust, and the
surviving records. If we look right at the center of that address, al-Qaeda's operational game is
historically established. They developed a strategy, selected targets, recruited and trained
participants, moved money, and tested aviation security. Ultimately, they successfully executed
a coordinated attack by exploiting an existing aviation enclosure. You see, that prior aviation
system simply didn't anticipate passenger aircraft being used as guided weapons. It treated hijackings
as hostage negotiations. The attackers recognized that specific rule set, and they used it to their
absolute devastating advantage. Section four, the post-event custody game, managing the evidence.
But here is where things get really interesting. Immediately following the event, the rules of the
game shifted entirely. There's a stark separation between the tragic operational game of the attack
itself and the post-event custody game. Right after the attacks, agencies suddenly realize
their massive exposure. We start seeing litigation holds, immediate document classification,
institutional defense, and shifting public access. Forensic NCM highlights that this institutional
self-protection is a completely different game from the attack itself. It has entirely different
players, different moves, and completely different payoffs. And that leads us to the ultimate
realization in Forensic NCM. Benefit downstream does not establish causal authorship upstream.
Just because intelligence agencies or defense contractors benefited from 9/11 downstream,
through massively increased budgets and hugely expanded authority, it absolutely does not mean
they orchestrated the attacks upstream. A panicked emergency institution can absolutely reproduce the
conditions that sustain its new authority without ever having to invent the underlying threat in the
first place. Section 5. A new outer enclosure. 9/11 as the enclosing condition. Once those immediate
attacks ended, the map actually turned inside out. The event itself became the outer enclosure,
projecting massive new conditions inward on society. We're talking about the 2001 legal
authorization for war, the creation of DHS, radically expanded surveillance, and the military
enclosures of the post-9/11 wars and Guantanamo. There's even a bodily enclosure. The WTC dust
disease is still living inside the bodies of first responders today. The perpetrators caused the event,
sure, but they did not write every statute, appropriate every dollar, or invade every
country that followed. The United States and its partners constructed this massive 25-year response.
Just watch how this scales over time. What began as a one-day structural collapse,
rapidly solidified into a dynamic equilibrium. Within a single week, laws were passed that are
still actively enclosing us today. Fast-forward 25 years, and this one event has become a permanent
architecture of governance, a massive surveillance apparatus, and tragically, a source of chronic
physical illness for over 130,000 people in the WTC health program. Section 6. The Final Frontier.
The Boundary of Authority. Every map, no matter how incredibly vast,
has to eventually end. And in NCM, this is called the Final Frontier. It's not a physical wall,
but a deterministic boundary of evidence. It's the absolute edge where an account must stop claiming
authority because the available evidence stops. The Final Frontier defends reality from official
accounts that overstep their bounds, while at the exact same time preventing conspiracy
theories from rushing in and filling the void of the unknown with false certainty.
When we map 9/11 using this framework, our map must lawfully halt at some very specific boundaries.
We have undisclosed national security intelligence records. We have unadjudicated
Saudi civil evidence and diplomacy. We have incomplete forensic reproductions of the exact
structural collapse mechanisms. We just have to honestly acknowledge that some physical,
diplomatic, and archival questions simply remain beyond our current public authority.
We literally cannot pretend to know what we cannot see. So, as we wrap up this explainer,
I want to leave you with a final, provocative thought. Can we accept the boundary of the unknown
without filling it with false certainty? It is actually honorable to leave the frontier
of human knowledge blank until real, concrete evidence arrives. By doing that, we keep the
victims human, rather than allowing their memories to be hijacked as some sort of renewable
authorization for political or military actions they never chose.