Skip to content

Media / Foundations

Nested Causal Modelling: From Objects to Enclosures

A visual overview of enclosure mapping, causal structure, and intervention.

All films ↗Transcript glossary ↗Research index ↗

The program reverses the habit of beginning with isolated objects. It starts with the systems that hold them, follows exchanges across boundaries, distinguishes map from territory, and shows how that change in viewpoint creates actionable interventions.

Terms in this film

Explore the same term in other films through the transcript glossary.

bankbig bangboundariesboundary conditionsboundedcarboncausalitycellclimatecodecosmologydataeconomyenclosureenergyenvironmentequilibriumexposurefinal frontiergame theoryhealthhousingincentivesinfinityinformationinstitutionsknowledgelawlifemapsmarketmodelsmoneyNCMnested causal modelingnested causalitynothingpolicypowerproductionpublic healthrealityreferenceriskscalesciencesoilsystemstechnologytimetrustuniversevacuumvaluevector equilibriumwaterworkzero infinity

Continue into the research

Related work

Read the video transcript

Published captions, with their original wording.

Hey everyone, and welcome to The Explainer. Today, we are exploring an absolutely radical paradigm shift in how we understand systems, boundaries, and honestly the very limits of human knowledge itself.

We're diving deep into the concepts of nested causal modeling, an incredible framework brought to us by Sidjay A. Hubbard.

Now this isn't just about tweaking some old dusty theories. No, it is a fundamental rewiring of how we look at problems, and as we'll see, it's going to challenge some of our most deeply held basic assumptions.

So let's get into it. I want to kick things off with a genuinely mind-bending thought. Nothing is not empty. Nothing has always been doing more work than we admit.

You know, science and human intuition have pretty much always struggled with the idea of a vacuum, or a zero.

We usually think of nothing as just a gap, right? An empty room, a blank page. But as this explainer is going to show, a zero on a measuring instrument isn't the absence of the instrument.

The silence right before a musical note isn't the absence of music. We literally have to redefine nothing if we want to understand everything else.

Alright, so here is our roadmap for The Explainer today. We are going to hit five main acts. First, the illusion of nothing.

Second, objects versus enclosures. Third, we'll enter the zero infinity. Fourth, we'll take this beyond standard game theory, and finally, we'll look at reaching the final frontier.

Okay, jumping right into section one, the illusion of nothing. Or, as I like to think of it, when the map ends before the world actually does.

So to really grasp this, I want you to picture a mapmaker. Maps are incredibly useful because they flatten out mountains, and crucially, they have an edge.

But trouble starts brewing when we mistake our map for the real world. In this new model, that edge is called the final frontier.

It's the strict boundary at which a model absolutely must stop claiming authority before it starts producing total absurdities.

Think about physicists trying to deal with singularities, or climate models just hitting a brick wall.

When you push a mathematical equation or a policy way beyond the boundary where its base assumptions actually hold true, it doesn't mean the real world broke.

It just means your map ran out. You've hit the final frontier of that specific model.

Moving right along to section two, objects versus enclosures. This is where we see a real fundamental shift in perspective.

Now, this part is just fascinating. Normally, we are all about starting from things, right?

We look at a rock, a cell, or a person, and we ask, "What is that made of?"

But nested causal modeling completely flips the script and says, "We need to start from enclosures."

Think about a world pool for a second. You can measure it, you can snap a photo of it, but you definitely can't pick it up and put it on a kitchen table.

A world pool only exists as a pattern departure inside a moving body of water.

Its entire reality depends completely on the enclosure that is holding it.

Let's ground this with something you probably see every day. An empty chair.

You might look at it and just see a piece of furniture, but actually, it is a structured enclosure of meaning.

Let me ask you. Is it an empty chair at a family dinner table representing a really profound personal loss?

Or is it an empty chair in a corporate boardroom signaling a massive shift in executive power?

The physical object itself is exactly the same, but what that emptiness actually means is entirely dictated by what encloses it.

And this reads us directly into what are called the three laws of nested causality.

First up, we've got the law of nested causal enclosure. This means every stable system is held inside larger systems that project their conditions inward.

You, for instance, are enclosed by biology, by culture, and by the economy.

Second is the law of nested exchange. Systems survive by exchanging energy, value, or information across those boundaries.

Like when a factory pollutes a river, that cost doesn't just magically vanish, it exchanges right into the environmental enclosure.

And third, the law of nested infinities. Nesting goes on forever in both directions, up and down,

but every single usable model must have a clearly stated boundary to prevent an infinite regress.

Which brings us to section three. Enter the zero infinity, the ultimate reference state.

Okay, so how do we actually redefine zero? Because everyday zero, well, it just means a blank void, right?

No money in the bank or an empty room, but the zero infinity isn't an empty void at all.

It is zero as perfect balance. They give it like a perfectly balanced scale, the baseline from which every possible thing in the universe can be measured as a departure.

It is not a physical place, and it's not some mythic origin event like the Big Bang. It's the ultimate balanced baseline.

Everything we see, a wave crashing, a sudden fever, a massive market crash, is simply a departure from the state.

And that gives us this really brilliant mathematical visual.

Right there at the center is VE, or vector equilibrium, representing that perfect infinite balance.

And flanking that, you have departures from that balance, whether they are contracting inward or expanding outward.

But notice, both are bounded by their final frontier.

This whole setup isn't just modeling an isolated physical object, it's mapping a dynamic balanced reference state that literally gives thought a beginning.

Alright, section four, beyond standard game theory. We're going to look at modeling infinite scale and depth.

So, what does this actually look like in the real world?

Well, when we take nested causal modeling and apply it to high stakes, human conflict, and policy, we go way, way beyond standard game theory into infinite scale and depth.

Standard game theory, for instance, looks at players, strategies, and the incentives to defect or cooperate.

And hey, it's incredibly useful. But nested causal modeling, or NCM, flips this and looks at the enclosures.

Instead of just asking if a player will defect, NCM asks a much deeper question, what is the top-down causal flow?

What happens to the meaning of the actions on the board, when the rules of the enclosures themselves change completely?

To see exactly how this plays out, let's look at an example straight from the source material regarding NDAA, section 219, a proposed U.S. defense technology cooperation initiative.

Now, standard game theory might just calculate the payoff of cooperation versus defection here, but NCM says, hold on, look at the top enclosure.

If the top enclosure is an alliance, deep-tech integration yields cooperation, shared production, and trust.

But, if that top enclosure ever changes state to an adversary enclosure, those exact same actions change meaning instantly.

Co-production suddenly becomes dependency. Shared data immediately becomes critical exposure.

NCM models the structural risk of how the causal chain completely reverses meaning based on the boundary condition that's holding it.

It's a total game-changer for risk assessment.

Finally, let's head into section 5, reaching the final frontier, aiming at the true edge of knowledge.

So, we can actually point this powerful framework directly at our own science and institutions using what's called the frontier test.

It's a direct challenge to the status quo. Basically, it asks one question, where does the current model stop working?

Science shouldn't be about permanently defending existing institutions or just constantly funding legacy models that only work locally.

Society absolutely must fund the actual boundary of knowledge.

We have to be brutally honest and ask ourselves when our institutional maps refuse to stop and just start producing absurdities.

Because honestly, when fields forget their boundaries, they fail.

Take climate policy, for example. When you take the entire massive enclosure of life, the soil, the water, complex human systems,

and you reduce it just to carbon alone, the map is broken.

In cosmology, treating the big bang as the absolute mandatory edge of all possible maps really limits our understanding of broader boundary conditions.

And in biology and public health, reducing a human patient to a molecular disease code while totally ignoring their enclosure, their housing, their stress, their environment results in failed care.

These fields miss the mark completely when they protect their legacy maps instead of funding the true frontier.

And wow, that brings us to the end of today's explainer.

We've covered a ton of ground, but before we wrap up, I want to leave you with one final, pretty provocative thought.

Your map ends before the world does. So, where's your final frontier?

Whether it's in your business, your relationships, or your entire worldview, what is the enclosure holding your reality, and where exactly does that model stop working?

Find the boundaries, and I promise you, you'll start seeing the world as it truly is.

Thanks so much for joining me on this deep dive, and I'll catch you next time.